Difference Between Microchanneling And Microneedling
Are you confused about the difference between microchanneling and microneedling? You're not alone. While both treatments involve using a device with tiny needles to stimulate collagen production in the skin, there are some key differences between the two. Microchanneling is a newer procedure that has gained popularity in recent years, but how does it compare to microneedling, which has been around for decades? In this blog post, we will explore the discrepancies between these two treatments and delve deeper into how microchanneling serves as the preferred treatment for fostering collagen production. If you're considering either of these treatments, keep reading to learn more and make an informed decision.
While falling within the same treatment realm and sharing common underlying principles, microneedling and microchanneling exhibit distinct variances based on the tools and methodologies employed.
Microneedling entails the use of a handheld microneedle roller or derma roller, maneuvered across the skin to induce minute punctures. However, improper use through a dragging motion might lead to microtears, potentially resulting in enduring skin damage.
In contrast, microchanneling employs a stamp-like device to create uniform microchannels on the skin. This approach yields benefits by mitigating discomfort, inflammation, and actual skin damage, consequently reducing recovery time. Typically, downtime post a microchanneling session is merely 60 to 90 minutes, a significant improvement from the recommended 24 hours following microneedling.
Another notable divergence lies in the availability of microneedling devices for home use. While not encouraged without consulting your professional technician, home-based derma rollers or devices feature shorter, blunt needles that don't penetrate the skin deeply. Hence, the process is less uncomfortable compared to professional sessions. Despite their limited efficacy, these tools boost blood circulation in the skin.
Now that we've delineated the discrepancies between microneedling and microchanneling, let's delve deeper into how microchanneling serves as the preferred treatment for fostering collagen production.
One of the main benefits of microchanneling is that it promotes the production of collagen without causing any significant damage to the skin. Collagen is a protein that gives skin its strength and elasticity, and as we age, our body's natural collagen production slows down. This can lead to the formation of wrinkles, fine lines, and sagging skin. However, microchanneling helps to jumpstart the production of collagen, which can lead to firmer, smoother, and more youthful-looking skin. In fact, studies have shown that microchanneling can increase collagen production by up to 400% more than other similar treatments. This means that individuals who opt for microchanneling can see significant improvements in their skin's texture and appearance.
While microneedling and microchanneling share some similarities, they also have significant differences in terms of tools and methodologies employed. Microchanneling is a preferred treatment option as it is less invasive and helps mitigate discomfort, inflammation, and actual skin damage. It is also associated with a shorter downtime compared to microneedling. Additionally, while home-based derma rollers are available for microneedling, they are less effective than professional sessions. On the other hand, microchanneling remains the best option for fostering collagen production.
So, if you're looking for a skin treatment that can help you achieve glowing, healthy skin, reach out to Advance Laser Clinic.
Get in Touch with Today!